When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 'New' Gemini 747-100/200 Mould

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The 'New' Gemini 747-100/200 Mould

    ~~Nearly a year ago I wrote a thread about my attempts to like the old Gemini 747 mould. Of course it is not Gemini's only classic 747 mould and since 2006 (I was surprised it was so long ago) they have been using a new mould albeit rather sparingly. Judging by the DB they have made:

    UTA F-BTDG
    KLM PH-BUN
    Air New Zealand ZK-NTX
    SR Demonstrator JA8114
    Virgin G-VIRG
    Northwest N624US 2000s Clrs
    Northwest N641NW Bowling Shoe
    America West N531AW
    Air Force One
    American N9674
    Flying Tigers N800FT

    So only 11 models in about 9 years - not a great return. I had never got any of these as they also sell for a RRP of $39.95 which is right at the top of my limit for model purchases and call me a snob but well over what I'd usually pay for a Gemini.

    Recently however good deals have allowed me to pickup 2 of the 11 - the Flying Tigers and the America West. So I thought I'd take a quick look at how the old moulds compares to the new and see if Gemini has made a major improvement.

    Here's my old mould PA 747:


    Pan Am Gemini Jets 747-100 by rstretton, on Flickr

    and the new mould FT 747:


    Flying Tigers Boeing 747-123SF by rstretton, on Flickr

    The nose shape of both moulds is good but Gemini has fixed their cockpit printing issue which afflicted a lot of their original 747s (i.e. the windows are much to large). The rest of the fuselage and wing joint appears largely the same except that the rear seam is gone. Looking at the wings they appear effectively the same except for the addition of slightly chunky HF aerials at the wingtips. What hasn't been fixed is junction of the engine pylon and wing which in the previous thread caused much displeasure.

    The other major change is the undercarriage which has been totally replaced with rather nice new rolling gears. The gear is actually rather chunky but that's not necessarily a bad thing (see later).

    Here are the same moulds from the back:

    Old:

    Pan Am Gemini Jets 747-100 by rstretton, on Flickr

    New:

    Flying Tigers Boeing 747-123SF by rstretton, on Flickr

    So in many ways the 'New' mould is really a warmed up version of the old mould however that isn't a bad thing since in general the old mould had good bones. In fact if it weren't for the pylon/engine issue I'd say the new mould is a complete success. As it is I really like it and aside from price haven't any issues getting it.

    Good job Gemini - though to be honest you still have a little way to go to match the AC / Big Bird Mk1 / Witty mould shown here:


    Trans World Big Bird 747-100 by rstretton, on Flickr
    --
    http://yesterdaysairlines.weebly.com/

  • #2
    ~~And the reason why the slightly chunky undercarriage is good? This I show my recent AWA 747 arrived. It must have gotten a whack in transit. Unbelievably I was able to bend the nose gear back into shape - something that no Aeroclassics gear would have allowed (they are so light they usually just snap whence why they've started bagging them separately for DC-10s and 747s). Thank you Gemini!


    AWA 747 Nosewheel Damage by rstretton, on Flickr
    --
    http://yesterdaysairlines.weebly.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm happy that GJ remade the classic jumbos.. I'm looking forward to Kalitta Air and a handful of others. I'd love to see a Cathay Cargo in the "Silver Bullet" scheme.

      I'm one of those guys that is not going to pay $50 for a model no matter how good it is.. Phoenix models are the most expensive I'll spend money on.

      Comment

      Bottom Ad

      Collapse
      Working...
      X